Last data update: May 06, 2024. (Total: 46732 publications since 2009)
Records 1-4 (of 4 Records) |
Query Trace: Nerlander LM[original query] |
---|
HIV prevalence among women who exchange sex for money or drugs - 4 U.S. cities
Nerlander LM , Handanagic S , Hess KL , Lutnick A , Agnew-Brune CB , Hoots BE , Braunstein SL , Glick SN , Higgins E , Padgett P , Schuette SM , Broz D , Ivy W3rd , Smith A , Thorson A , Paz-Bailey G . J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2020 84 (4) 345-354 BACKGROUND: Limited data exist in the United States on the prevalence of HIV among women who exchange sex. SETTING: We estimate HIV prevalence of women who exchange sex from a 2016 survey in Chicago, Detroit, Houston, and Seattle and compare it with the prevalence of HIV among women of low socioeconomic status (SES), who did not exchange sex, and women in the general population. METHODS: Women who exchange sex were recruited via respondent-driven sampling among some cities participating in National HIV Behavioral Surveillance, interviewed, and offered HIV testing. We estimate HIV prevalence and, using prevalence ratios, compare it with the prevalence among women of low SES who did not exchange sex in the 2013 National HIV Behavioral Surveillance cycle, and to women in the general population estimated using 2015 National HIV Surveillance data. RESULTS: One thousand four hundred forty women reported exchange sex in 2016. Aggregated HIV prevalence was 4.9% [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.7 to 7.1] among women who exchanged sex, 1.6% (95% CI: 0.3 to 2.8) among women of low SES who did not exchange sex, and 0.6% (95% CI: 0.5% to 0.6%) among women in the general population. HIV prevalence among women who exchanged sex was 3.1 times (95% CI: 1.6 to 5.9) as high as among women of low SES who did not exchange sex, and 8.8 times (95% CI: 7.0 to 11.1) as high as among women in the general population. CONCLUSION: HIV prevalence was significantly higher among women who exchanged sex compared with women in the general population and women of low SES who did not exchange sex. |
Exchange sex and HIV infection among women who inject drugs - 20 US cities, 2009
Nerlander LM , Hess KL , Rose CE , Sionean C , Thorson A , Broz D , Paz-Bailey G . J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2017 75 Suppl 3 S333-s340 BACKGROUND: Women who inject drugs and who also exchange sex are at increased risk for HIV infection, but data on this population in the United States remain sparse. METHODS: This study assessed the prevalence of exchanging sex for money or drugs among women who inject drugs using data from the 2009 US National HIV Behavioral Surveillance (NHBS) system. Prevalence of being HIV-positive (testing positive in NHBS), HIV-positive-unaware (reporting being HIV-negative or unknown status but testing positive in NHBS), and risk behaviors and use of services were compared between women who did and did not exchange sex. The association between exchange sex and being HIV-positive-unaware of the infection was examined using multivariate Poisson models with robust standard errors. RESULTS: Among 2305 women who inject drugs, 39% reported receiving things like money or drugs from ≥1 male partners in exchange for oral, vaginal, or anal sex in the previous 12 months. Women who exchanged sex were more likely to be unemployed, homeless, lack health insurance, have multiple condomless vaginal or anal sex partners, and receptively share syringes. In multivariate analysis, exchange sex was associated with being HIV-positive-unaware (adjusted prevalence ratio 1.97, 95% confidence intervals: 1.31 to 2.97). CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of exchange sex was high in this population. Women who exchange sex were more likely to be socially disadvantaged, report sexual and injection risk, and be HIV-positive-unaware. They represent an important group to reach with HIV prevention, testing, and care services. |
Behaviors associated with a risk of HIV transmission from HIV-positive street youth to non-street youth in Ukraine
Nerlander LM , Zapata LB , Yorick R , Skipalska H , Smith RA , Kissin DM , Jamieson DJ , Vitek CR , Hillis SD . Sex Transm Dis 2015 42 (9) 513-20 BACKGROUND: Little is known about the extent to which HIV-infected street youth (living part or full time on the streets) exhibit behaviors associated with HIV transmission in their interactions with youth not living on the streets ("non-street youth"). We aimed to determine prevalences and predictors of such "bridging behaviors": inconsistent condom use and needle sharing between HIV-positive street youth and non-street youth. METHODS: A total of 171 street youth in 3 Ukrainian cites were identified as HIV infected after testing of eligible participants aged 15 to 24 years after random selection of venues. Using data from these youth, we calculated prevalence estimates of bridging behaviors and assessed predictors using logistic regression. RESULTS: Overall, two-thirds of HIV-infected street youth exhibited bridging behaviors; subgroups with high prevalences of bridging included females (78.3%) and those involved in transactional sex (84.2%). In multivariable analysis, inconsistent condom use with non-street youth was associated with being female (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR], 1.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-1.4), working (aPR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.03-1.4), multiple partners (aPR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.6), and "never" (aPR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.6) or "sometimes" (aPR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.02-1.8) versus "always" sleeping on the street. Needle sharing with non-street youth was associated with being male (aPR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.02-2.0), orphaned (aPR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.8-3.0), and 2 years or less living on the streets (aPR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.5-2.1). CONCLUSIONS: Bridging behaviors between HIV-infected street youth and non-street youth are common. Addressing the comprehensive needs of street and other at-risk youth is a critical prevention strategy. |
Short interpregnancy interval associated with preterm birth in US adolescents
Nerlander LM , Callaghan WM , Smith RA , Barfield WD . Matern Child Health J 2014 19 (4) 850-8 A short interpregnancy interval (IPI) is a risk factor for preterm delivery among women of reproductive age. As limited data exist concerning adolescents, we aimed to examine the association between short IPIs and preterm birth among adolescents using a majority of US births. Using 2007-2008 US natality data, we assessed the relationship between IPIs <3, 3-5, 6-11, and 12-17 months and moderately (32-36 weeks) and very (<32 weeks) preterm singleton live births among mothers <20 years, relative to IPIs 18-23 months. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CIs) adjusted for maternal race, age, previous preterm deliveries, marital status, smoking and prenatal care were determined from a multivariable multinomial logistic regression model. In 2007-2008, there were 85,077 singleton live births to women aged <20 who had one previous live birth, 69 % of which followed IPIs ≤18 months. Compared with IPIs 18-23 months, short IPIs were associated with moderately preterm birth for IPIs <3 months (aOR 1.89, 95 % CI 1.70-2.10), 3-5 months (aOR 1.33, 95 % CI 1.22-1.47), and 6-12 months (aOR 1.11, 95 % CI 1.02-1.21). IPIs <3 and <6 months were also associated with very preterm birth, with aORs of 2.52 (95 % CI 1.98-3.22) and 1.68 (95 % CI 1.35-2.10) respectively. Many adolescent mothers with repeat births have short IPIs, and shorter IPIs are associated with preterm birth in a dose-dependent fashion. Increasing adolescent mothers' use of effective contraception postpartum can address both unintended adolescent births and preterm birth. |
- Page last reviewed:Feb 1, 2024
- Page last updated:May 06, 2024
- Content source:
- Powered by CDC PHGKB Infrastructure